Versions tested: rc1, rc2
Optimal parameters: default
Links: http://phantasie.ton...
Authors: Yann Collet
Algorithms: LZ+HUF
Notable peformances: Qualifying2

etincelle

(Have info that should be added here? E-mail.)


Submitted on 10. April 2010 with two configurations. A new configuration submitted (19. April) and the author confirmed the anomaly of -m512 showing slower speed and low CPU usage on large data.

Qualified configurations
Ver Rating CPR DPR S.E. R.E. Ratio C. kB/s D. kB/s
<none>
rc1 61 87 13 553 0 2.745 67296 123806
rc2 63 +3.3% +4.6% +1.4% 2.750 +0.2% 68411 +1.7% 122853 -0.8%
-m256
rc1 61 86 13 549 0 2.746 66668 123224
rc2 63 +3.3% +5.8% +2.0% 2.751 +0.2% 68183 +2.3% 122192 -0.8%
-m512
rc1 52 69 13 468 0 2.746 53336 119647
rc2 56 +7.7% +13% +7.3% 2.751 +0.2% 58628 +9.9% 118813 -0.7%

Version info

rc1, tar: yes, mode: 32-bit, crc32: 420d03f5, decoder: 40 kB, tested: 2010 Apr 17
compression: etincelle.exe -c <args> <src> <cfile>
decompression: etincelle.exe -u <cfile> <src>
rc2, tar: yes, mode: 32-bit, crc32: 9b641ff4, decoder: 40 kB, tested: 2010 Apr 22
compression: etincelle.exe -c <args> <src> <cfile>
decompression: etincelle.exe -u <cfile> <src>
2017-2024 © www.compressionratings.com