Versions tested:0.06a, 0.07a
Rating:1127
Performance C/D:1238/422
Optimal parameters:-m.5g -cD
Links:http://nanozip.net/
Authors:Sami Runsas
Algorithms:LZP+HUF, LZ+HUF, LZ+ARI, BWT+DC/QLFC, CM, X86, DICT
Notable peformances:Application1, Application2, Application3, Audio1, Database1, Game1, Game2, Image1, Medical1, OS1, PGN1, Pitches1, Qualifying1, Qualifying2, Source1, Text1, Text2

NanoZip

The program has both graphical user interface (GUI) and command-line interface with 7 different compression modes:

(Have info that should be added here? E-mail.)


The reason 0.07a -cf and -cF compression times are slower than 0.06a is because the program uses an additional thread while accessing harddisk, which causes disk IO time to be included into the total times.

Qualified configurations
VerRatingCPRDPRS.E.R.E.RatioC. kB/sD. kB/s
CompressionRatings.Com
-m.5g -cD
0.06a1127123842220992774.100379624337
0.07a11270%0%-0.2%-0%0%4.1000%37960%24285-0.2%
-m.5g -cF
0.06a17333916218223.1661601015044
0.07a87-50%-67%0%-49%-3.1660%5337-67%14768-1.8%
-m.5g -cO
0.06a82088235537015305.2453572711
0.07a833+1.6%+1.6%+0.6%+0.5%+2.9%5.254+0.2%358+0.3%2687-0.9%
-m.5g -cc
0.06a4167564415110625.481224246
0.07a418+0.5%0%0%0%+0.9%5.485+0%223-0.4%247+0.4%
-m.5g -cd
0.06a87110701933205813.710869229542
0.07a866-0.6%-0.5%-0.5%-0.5%-1.2%3.7100%8649-0.5%29349-0.7%
-m.5g -cf
0.06a22412207802.5613376435473
0.07a6-73%-85%-72%2.5610%5615-83%34901-1.6%
-m.5g -co
0.06a93810333456749014.8058125117
0.07a960+2.3%+2.4%+1.2%+1.3%+3.6%4.812+0.1%822+1.2%5099-0.4%

Version info

v0.06a, using tar: no, using sfx: yes
compression: nz.exe w32c -r -y -nm -forcemem <args> <cfile> <src>
decompression: <cfile> x
v0.07a, using tar: no, using sfx: yes
compression: nz.exe w32c -r -y -nm -forcemem <args> <cfile> <src>
decompression: <cfile> x